What an excellent shot… great light in there. How did you come across this scene? Was it set-up like this when you got here; stiletto and all… asking coz I’m curious. Really like this!
Thanks, Richard, for “outing” me…! The stiletto wasn’t in that position, but it WAS there, just a few feet away, and everything else was just as pictured.
Given that I didn’t introduce any “foreign” objects into the scene, I feel it was ok to do it.
It’s an interesting topic in the digital age, I feel; you may have heard about the case where a nature photographer cloned a few extra lion cubs into a photo of his…His argument being that it could have been that way.
Personally, I feel that’s stretching it a little too far, given the subject matter in his case.
Thanks for the explanation. Even with the repositioning of the stiletto it’s still a great shot. Personally I don’t mind at all with photographers fiddling their photos, as long as they are honest about it and not trying to con people.
What an excellent shot… great light in there. How did you come across this scene? Was it set-up like this when you got here; stiletto and all… asking coz I’m curious. Really like this!
Thanks, Richard, for “outing” me…! The stiletto wasn’t in that position, but it WAS there, just a few feet away, and everything else was just as pictured.
Given that I didn’t introduce any “foreign” objects into the scene, I feel it was ok to do it.
It’s an interesting topic in the digital age, I feel; you may have heard about the case where a nature photographer cloned a few extra lion cubs into a photo of his…His argument being that it could have been that way.
Personally, I feel that’s stretching it a little too far, given the subject matter in his case.
Thanks for the explanation. Even with the repositioning of the stiletto it’s still a great shot. Personally I don’t mind at all with photographers fiddling their photos, as long as they are honest about it and not trying to con people.